In California v. Greenwald, Mr. Greenwood caught the attention of law enforcement when they intercepted a suspected drug transportation to his address. Neighbors also reported heavy vehicular traffic at his residence. Naturally, the cops set up shop on his house and observed him putting out his trash cans. What he didn’t expect was the garbageman. Law enforcement arranged with the garbage collectors to give them Mr. Greenwood’s trash, unmixed, & prior to transporting it to their facility. What do you know? The black, opaque trash bags they delivered to police contained cocaine and/or “items indicative of drug use” when opened and searched. Based on this evidence, police obtained a search warrant leading to the discovery of considerably more cocaine inside the residence.
Naturally, Mr. Greenwood felt the evidence against him was garbage. He challenged this trash all the way to the United States Supreme Court. Unfortunately for Mr. Greenwald, the result stunk, but the message was clear: there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what you throw out.
This rule is based in two distinct characteristics of trash:
- Being “readily accessible” to the public; &
- An Intent to convey the property to a “third party.”
- “Some” evidence tying the garbage to the residence. Such as:

