Criminal Defense Information

CHICAGO POLICE DIDN’T READ ME MY RIGHTS?

Hold up. What? Case dismissed!!! You probably even have a lawsuit.

 
 

If it were only that easy. Sadly, Miranda warnings protect your to remain silent, not innocent.

 
 

The most important thing to remember about Miranda is that it only applies to your statements.

 
 

What does this mean for your case?

IF THEY DON’T NEED YOUR STATEMENTS, MIRANDA DOESN’T MATTER

 

Maybe it comes from watching too many episodes of COPS or Law & Order, but the failure to read you your Miranda doesn’t throw out your case, only your statements. If the crack is in your pocket, it’s in your pocket, no matter what you say. A drunk prosecutor doesn’t need your statements to prove that case.

 

Simply put, if the State has enough evidence to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, it won’t matter if they didn’t read your Miranda rights. Think: it’s on video, witnesses, forensic evidence, etc. Your statements might be relevant for your defense, but the State won’t need them for your demise.  This is when you need to call a confident, experienced criminal defense attorney.

 

WHEN DOES MIRANDA MATTER?

 

The failure to read you your Miranda rights will only help your case if:

 

  1. Your statements are necessary evidence for the State’s case &
  2. You are:
    1. “In custody” &
    2. Being Interrogated.[1]

 

The law defines “custody” as a formal arrest or “restraint on freedom of movement to the degree associated with formal arrest.”[2] “Interrogation” refers to “Express questioning” as well as “any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are likely to elicit an incriminating response.”[3]

 

But how do these concepts apply in real life situations? How does Miranda generally apply in common types of police encounters? When do the cops have to give you Miranda warnings?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The key to any question about whether Miranda warnings are required is: Custody + Interrogation. Whether or not your are in custody, rather than just detained or generally interacting with the police, is not always clear. In these cases, a Judge will consider the following factors to determine whether or not you were “in custody:”

 

 

Chicago police stationYou have a 5th amendment right to remain silent, whether or not you are under arrest.  Unfortunately, you don’t always have to be told that. Statements or no statements, the most important right you have is the right to a lawyer. When you have a lawyer, or even affirmatively request one, the police CANNOT QUESTION YOU.[15] Forget the formula of custody + interrogation to figure out if the police didn’t do their job. Leave that to us. The best formula is lawyer, lawyer, lawyer. And at Robert Callahan & Associates, we know exactly what to say to the police: My client will be making:

NO STATEMENTS.

 

[1] Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 420 (1965)

[2] Id. at 429.

[3] Rhode Island v. Innis, 496 U.S.291 (1980).

[4] Berkemer v. McCarthy, 468 U.S. 420, 440 (1984)

[5] Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997).

[6] California v. Beheler, 463 U.S. 1121, 1125 (1983).

[7] Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582 (1990).

[8] Id. at 591-592. Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 761 (1966).

[9] Berkemer, 468 U.S. at 439.

[10] People v. Parks, 48 Ill. 2d 232, 237 (1971).

[11] People v. Hannah, 991 N.E.2d 412, 427 (1st Dist. 2013).

[12] United States v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492, 495 (1977).

[13] U.S. Const. Amdt. XIV.

[14] People v. Slater, 228 Ill.2d 137, 150 (IL SCT. 2008) People v. Melock, 149 Ill. 2d 423, 440 (1992).

[15] Smith v. Illinois, 469 U.S. 91, 98 (1984); Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981).

 

Robert J Callahan
53 W Jackson Blvd #1442
Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 322-9000

Share on:

Start Fighting for Your Rights Today

Speak with an experienced Chicago criminal defense lawyer.

Call (312) 322-9000
Call Now: (312) 322-9000